Disputes over solar panels for power generation

Are solar technology patents being litigated?

Given the relatively mature state of solar technology and the number of companies operating and seeking to operate in the sector, it is not surprising that there has been an increase in litigation in recent years concerning the patents underlying solar technologies. One of the most significant disputes to date has been between SolarEdge and Huawei.

Who is responsible for a solar project in the UK?

Solar energy is expected to more than double by 2030 and will therefore continue to be a key part of the UK’s decarbonisation strategy. The main parties to solar projects will often include the: Developer (employer) – who obtains planning consent and finance for the project. Contractor – who is responsible for building the solar plant.

Does SolarEdge have a patent dispute with SMA Solar?

SolarEdge is also involved in a global patent dispute with competitor SMA Solar Technology, in which SolarEdge is defending infringement proceedings and challenging the validity of SMA Solar's patents that also relate to inverter technology. Another separate, ongoing multi-jurisdictional dispute of note is between Hanwha Q-Cells and Longi Solar.

Do solar panels need patents?

Companies involved in this increased uptake of solar power need to be aware of patents not just where they are ultimately used, but also where they manufacture and assemble panels and their components. This is reflected in patenting trends.

Do solar plant projects have performance issues?

While parties to solar plant projects will try to deliver complete and functioning assets, performance issues and disputes will invariably arise from time to time. Some common examples we see include issues relating to: Internal corrosion due to water ingress.

What happens if a solar project is delayed?

Previously, delayed completion could cause a solar project to become unviable due to a failure to achieve accreditation for incentive payments. In early large-scale solar projects, this failure could result in the contractor having to remove all plant and equipment and reinstate the site at its own cost.